Honest numbers, the way we'd write them on a piece of paper for a client sitting across the counter. No vanity defaults. No padded protein. Just a starting point you can actually use.
Body fat distribution and baseline metabolic rate differ between men and women — the chart and the math both adjust based on this.
Use a morning weight after the bathroom and before food or drink. If you fluctuate a lot, take a 7-day average.
Most people don't know their exact body fat percentage. That's fine — pick the figure that matches honestly and we'll handle the rest. Anchoring protein to lean mass instead of total bodyweight gives you a more accurate target, especially if you have weight to lose.
Tap the figure that's closest to your current physique.
Pick based on a 7-day average, not your best week. Most people overestimate this by one level — be conservative.
Pick one. You can always shift later — most goals work best when you commit to the same target for at least three weeks before adjusting.
Use these as a baseline. Hold them steady for 2–3 weeks, watch the scale and how you feel, then adjust if needed.
The math we'd otherwise produce is below 1500 kcal/day. We don't recommend or condone severe caloric deficits — they're hard to sustain, hard to do safely, and almost never the right answer for the long term. If you genuinely need to eat this low, work with a registered dietitian or physician rather than a free calculator.
Most calculators online use one equation, one protein number, and one activity multiplier. That's fine until you're trying to feed a real person. Here's how this one decides what to tell you.
If you give us a body fat estimate, we use the Katch–McArdle equation, which calculates your basal metabolic rate (BMR) from lean mass rather than total bodyweight. This is more accurate for anyone outside the average — leaner, heavier, more muscular, or higher body fat. If you skip the body fat estimate, we fall back to Mifflin–St Jeor, which is the most accurate general-population equation we have. Harris–Benedict (the original, and the one most calculators still use) is over a hundred years old and runs about 5% high — we don't use it.
Sedentary multiplies your BMR by 1.2. Lightly active is 1.375. Moderately active is 1.55. Very active is 1.725. These are the standard, well-validated activity factors. The biggest mistake people make here is overestimating — pick the bracket that matches your actual seven-day average, not your best week.
Your protein target is calculated against lean body mass (if you provided a body fat estimate) or total weight (if you didn't), then scaled by both your activity level and whether you're in a fat loss phase. At maintenance or in a surplus, protein runs 0.7 g/lb (sedentary) up to 1.0 g/lb (very active). In a fat loss phase, we push these up to 0.9–1.2 g/lb — protein needs are genuinely higher during a deficit, both for muscle preservation and for satiety, which is one of the biggest predictors of whether someone sticks to a cut.
Anchoring protein to lean mass means a 250-pound person isn't told to eat 250 grams of protein when 160 would do the job better.
Fat is calculated as either 0.3 g per pound of total bodyweight, or 20% of your target calories — whichever is higher. This protects hormonal function, especially during a deficit. The carb/fat slider lets you shift toward more fat or more carbs based on personal preference, but the floor stays put.
After protein and fat are accounted for, the remaining calories go to carbohydrate. This is intentional — carbs are the most flexible macronutrient for performance, recovery, and adherence, so they absorb the variation.
We use the Institute of Medicine recommendation of 14 grams of fibre per 1000 calories of food eaten, rounded up to the nearest whole gram. This is more accurate than a flat number — a 1500-calorie cut and a 3000-calorie bulk shouldn't have the same fibre target.
If the math produces a target below 1500 calories per day, we cap it there and show a warning. Very low calorie diets are hard to do safely on your own — they make nutrient adequacy nearly impossible, they accelerate lean mass loss, and they almost always backfire on adherence. If you genuinely need to eat this low, work with a registered dietitian or physician.
This calculator is a starting point, not a prescription. It's built on solid science and well-validated equations, but it cannot account for medical conditions, medications, hormone status, age-related changes, eating disorder history, pregnancy, or any of the dozens of variables that affect how your body actually responds to food.
Nothing here is medical advice. If you have a medical condition, are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a history of disordered eating, or are considering an aggressive cut, talk to a registered dietitian or physician before changing your diet.
If you use the numbers, watch how you feel, and adjust honestly, this calculator will get you most of the way there. If you don't, no calculator can save you.